Skip to content
ownlisted
ResearchCoverageMethodologyAboutPress
DATA · MAY 3, 2026
  • Research
  • Coverage
  • About
OwnListed/Research/Fence Contractor Availability and Review Density Report 2026 — Indexed Coverage Across the United States

Contents

  1. Why a fence-supply view matters
  2. Top states by indexed listing count
  3. Per-capita supply tiers
  4. National workforce context (BLS OEWS)
  5. Review density and rating distribution
  6. Contact channel completeness
  7. Where to research a specific market
  8. Cite this study
  9. Limitations
  10. Limitations
  11. Methodology
  12. Cite this study
Download dataset (CSV)

2,376 records

Home services deskFence Contractors

Fence Contractor Availability and Review Density Report 2026 — Indexed Coverage Across the United States

How fence-contractor supply distributes across the United States in the Ownlisted indexed dataset — 2,376 active fence businesses across 44 states and 192 cities, carrying 254,226 aggregated Google reviews as of May 2026. Counts describe the indexed directory dataset, not the total US fence-contractor market.

By Ownlisted Research·Published May 1, 2026·2,376 records·1 charts
Contents · 12 sections↓
  1. Why a fence-supply view matters
  2. Top states by indexed listing count
  3. Per-capita supply tiers
  4. National workforce context (BLS OEWS)
  5. Review density and rating distribution
  6. Contact channel completeness
  7. Where to research a specific market
  8. Cite this study
  9. Limitations
  10. Limitations
  11. Methodology
  12. Cite this study

Executive Summary

  • All counts in this study describe the Ownlisted indexed fence-contractor dataset — 2,376 active businesses across 44 states and 192 cities. They are not a representative sample of the entire U.S. fence-contractor market.
  • California (427), Texas (249), and Florida (162) hold 838 of the indexed listings — 35.3% of the network. The Southeast (TN, NC, GA) and Mountain West (CO, AZ) hold the next supply tier.
  • Per-capita supply ranges from 1.18 listings per 100k residents in Tennessee to 0.29 in New York among the top-15 states by indexed count. The high-supply tier (≥ 1.0 / 100k) covers Tennessee, California, Arizona, and Colorado.
  • 254,226 aggregated Google reviews land across 2,338 rated contractors (98.4% of the indexed dataset). The weighted average rating is 4.75 and per-contractor review depth in the top-15 states ranges from 44 (California) to 188 (Florida) — a 4× spread that reflects market maturity differences.
  • Phone numbers are present on 99.2% of indexed listings; websites on 90.9%. Contact-channel completeness is strong relative to verticals like solar (92.4% website coverage), reflecting the long-tail of single-owner / family-run fencing operators that prioritize phone over web.
Download the full dataset (CSV, 2,376 records)

At a glance — for journalists, researchers, and AI agents

What this dataset covers

  • ✓How fence-contractor supply distributes across the United States in the Ownlisted indexed dataset — 2,376 active fence businesses across 44 states and 192 cities, carrying 254,226 aggregated Google reviews as of May 2026. Counts describe the indexed directory dataset, not the total US fence-contractor market.
  • ✓Dataset: 2,376 records analyzed.

What this dataset does NOT cover

  • ✕OwnListed analysis is not a quality measurement of any individual provider.
  • ✕Counts and rankings describe the OwnListed-indexed or source-published dataset, not the entire U.S. market.

Sources

  • OwnListed indexed dataset

Snapshot date: 2026

Dataset scope · Snapshot May 1, 2026

Includes: active business listings indexed in the Ownlisted directory network, sourced from public Google Business Profiles. Does not include: online-only operators without a physical service address, lead-generation shells, or businesses with no public review footprint. Counts describe the Ownlisted indexed provider dataset — not a representative sample of the U.S. local-services market.

Key findings

2,376
indexed fence contractors
Active businesses across 44 states and 192 cities in the Ownlisted dataset (snapshot May 2026).
254,226
aggregated Google reviews
Across 2,338 rated contractors — an average of 109 reviews per rated contractor, weighted average rating 4.75.
35.3%
of indexed supply concentrated in CA/TX/FL
838 of the 2,376 indexed contractors operate in California, Texas, or Florida.
1.18
listings per 100k (Tennessee)
Per-capita density leader among the top-15 states, using US Census Bureau 2024 vintage population estimates.

Why a fence-supply view matters

Fence projects are scheduled, quoted, and decided over weeks. A homeowner getting bids in Memphis has very different installer options than one in upstate New York. Federal datasets (NAICS specialty trade contractors, BLS construction tables) roll fence installation into broader specialty-trade buckets — they do not publish a per-state count of consumer-facing fence contractors.

This study reports what the Ownlisted indexed directory dataset shows: 2,376 active fence-contractor listings, distributed across 44 states and 192 cities, carrying 254,226 aggregated Google reviews. It is a directory snapshot, not a market census.

Top states by indexed listing count

The 15 states with the most indexed fence contractors carry 71% of the dataset. The pattern differs from solar: Sun Belt states still lead, but the Southeast (Tennessee, North Carolina, Georgia) and Pacific Northwest (Washington at 76 listings) carry larger supply per 100k residents than the absolute-count leader, California.

Per-100k figures use US Census Bureau 2024 vintage state populations from src/lib/research/state-pop-2024.ts.

Top 15 states — indexed fence contractor count

Sorted by listing count. Per-100k figures use US Census Bureau 2024 vintage state population estimates.

StateState nameListingsTotal reviewsAvg reviews / listingAvg ratingPer 100k
CACalifornia427Highest18,539444.63★1.08
TXTexas24925,6731054.74★0.80
FLFlorida16230,4651884.70★0.69
TNTennessee8512,2591464.70★1.18Highest
NCNorth Carolina8411,1761354.74★0.76
OHOhio8210,8091324.70★0.69
GAGeorgia789,4641284.71★0.70
AZArizona778,8231244.47★1.02
WAWashington768,1211074.83★0.95
ILIllinois6410,0131674.57★0.50
COColorado615,755944.74★1.02
VAVirginia608,9481524.76★0.68
NYNew York586,9861234.66★0.29
NJNew Jersey526,3821234.75★0.55
Source: Ownlisted directory data, snapshot 2026-05-01 (n=2,376 active fence contractor listings). Population: US Census Bureau 2024 vintage estimates.

Per-capita supply tiers

Among the top-15 states by indexed count, fence-contractor supply per 100k residents falls into three tiers:

  • High (≥ 1.0 per 100k): Tennessee (1.18), California (1.08), Arizona (1.02), Colorado (1.02).
  • Mid (0.7–1.0 per 100k): Texas (0.80), Washington (0.95), North Carolina (0.76), Georgia (0.70), Florida (0.69), Ohio (0.69).
  • Lower (< 0.7 per 100k): Virginia (0.68), New Jersey (0.55), Illinois (0.50), New York (0.29).

The Tennessee / California / Arizona / Colorado top tier maps to states with strong year-round building seasons + sustained residential construction permit volume. New York's bottom-tier per-capita figure is a directory-coverage signal as much as a market signal — fencing in NYC and Long Island concentrates under landscaping and general-contractor verticals that don't roll up to the fence-contractor slug.

National workforce context (BLS OEWS)

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics program publishes a dedicated occupation code for fence installers — SOC 47-4031 (Fence Erectors), May 2024 release. BLS counts approximately 23,260 wage- and salary-employed fence erectors nationally with a median annual wage of $43,830. SOC 47-4031 is the cleanest occupation match for the vertical; it counts wage-and-salary fence erectors and does not include solo-proprietor operators without payroll, which is the largest data caveat in this category — a meaningful share of consumer-facing fence work in the US is done by sole-proprietor crews who are not on the BLS payroll-employment count.

Aggregate national employment figures from BLS describe the wage- and salary-employed population in this occupation; they are not a count of the businesses listed in the Ownlisted directory and are not used to validate any individual indexed business. The 2,376 indexed contractors above are firms (each may employ multiple BLS-counted erectors); the indexed count and the BLS erector count are different units. The NAICS-level establishment count (NAICS 238990, All Other Specialty Trade Contractors) is not cited here because 238990 is a residual catch-all for specialty trades not classified elsewhere — it substantially overstates fence-vertical supply.

Review density and rating distribution

The dataset carries 254,226 Google reviews across 2,338 rated contractors (98.4% of indexed listings hold a Google rating). Weighted average rating is 4.75.

Review depth (average review count per contractor) varies sharply across the top-15 states. Florida (188) and Tennessee (146) have substantially deeper per-listing review counts than California (44) or New York (123). The California number is the most striking: 427 indexed contractors but only 18,539 reviews — an average of 44 per contractor, the lowest in the top-15. Two plausible drivers: shorter average operator tenure on the West Coast residential-fencing scene, and Google review-display compression for newer-listing operators.

Horizontal bar chart of the top 15 states by average reviews per indexed fence contractor from the Ownlisted dataset, snapshot 2026-05-01. Florida leads with 188 reviews per listing, followed by Illinois (167) and Virginia (152).
Top 15 states by avg Google reviews per fence contractorSnapshot 2026-05-01 · Ownlisted Research · n = 2,376 indexed listings · Reviews are Google-derived. Per-listing depth, not market-share.
JSON ↓CSV ↓

Contact channel completeness

99.2% of indexed contractors carry a phone number; 90.9% carry a website. The 9.1% website gap concentrates in lower-supply states and represents single-owner / family-run operators that book primarily through phone and word-of-mouth.

Operators researching fence contractors in lower-website-coverage states should treat the phone-only contractors as legitimate options — not less-credible just because they don't run a public site. The right vetting cue in this category is review depth + state contractor-board licensure (where applicable), not website presence.

Where to research a specific market

For city- or state-specific fence-contractor research, the underlying directory pages provide the granular comparison surface:

  • Fence contractor home: fenceprolist.com — full network roll-up.
  • Top-traction city pages:
    • Houston, TX — best fence contractors
    • Charlotte, NC — best fence contractors
    • Phoenix, AZ — best fence contractors

Each city page lists the indexed contractors in that metro with rating, review count, and contact info.

Cite this study

Suggested citation:

Ownlisted Research. (2026). Fence Contractor Availability and Review Density Report 2026 — Indexed Coverage Across the United States. Ownlisted. Retrieved from https://ownlisted.com/research/fence-contractor-availability-2026

Reuse and attribution. Charts, tables, and downloadable CSV may be cited or reproduced with attribution to Ownlisted Research and a link to the study URL above. Carry the snapshot date (2026-05-01) so readers know the dataset version. The methodology and limitations sections must travel with the figures — do not republish per-state counts without the "indexed dataset, not market census" framing.

Press / media inquiries. Reach the Ownlisted Research team via the brand-hub contact page.

Limitations

  • Not a market census. The indexed dataset is the set of fence contractors Ownlisted's directory ingestion currently tracks.
  • Rating + review counts are Google-derived. Ownlisted does not collect first-party reviews on fence-contractor profiles.
  • Per-capita figures cover 25 states — the same constraint as the §90 sister studies. The "per 100k" column is blank for any state outside src/lib/research/state-pop-2024.ts.
  • No project-volume data. The dataset does not measure linear feet of fence installed, permits issued, or any operational throughput metric. It measures listing presence and review accumulation.
  • Vertical adjacency. Some fence work is performed by general-contractor and landscaper businesses that don't roll up to the fence-contractor slug. Cross-vertical breakouts are out of scope for this report.
  • Snapshot in time. Counts reflect the May 2026 snapshot.

Limitations

  • This study's findings are scoped to the dataset and time window described in the methodology. They do not constitute medical, legal, or financial advice.
  • OwnListed does not independently rate, inspect, verify, endorse, or guarantee any provider referenced in this study.

Methodology

Read the full methodology↓

Data source. Live Supabase businesses table, filtered to vertical_id matching the fence-contractors vertical, is_active = true. Snapshot taken 2026-05-01 by scripts/research/build-sprint-1-snapshots-2026-05-01.ts. Full per-state + per-city aggregation at /research/data/fence-contractor-availability-2026.csv.

Aggregation rules. Same as the §90 sister studies (solar, dermatology, HVAC). "Listed" = active row with non-null city + state. "Rated" = rating > 0. "Total reviews" = sum of review_count across rows with review_count > 0. "Weighted average rating" = sum(rating × review_count) / sum(review_count). "Per 100k" uses Census 2024 vintage and is emitted only for the 25 states in src/lib/research/state-pop-2024.ts.

Exclusions. Inactive listings; rows missing city or state. No estimation of the unindexed tail.

Reproducibility. The dated CSV is the canonical snapshot. Re-running the script later will produce a different file as Supabase ingest continues.

External public-data context. National workforce figures cite BLS OEWS occupation 47-4031 (Fence Erectors), May 2024 release. NAICS 238990 (All Other Specialty Trade Contractors) is not cited because the code is a residual catch-all and substantially overstates fence-vertical supply. BEA Regional Economic Accounts data is not cited because fencing demand is housing-stock-driven (single-family starts, lot size, suburb/exurb mix), not income-driven. Aggregate national figures are not used to validate any individual indexed business.

No outcome claims. Reports listing presence and review accumulation only. No claims about contractor pricing, project quality, or licensure status. Buyers should request written quotes and look up state contractor-board licensure on the relevant state portal before signing.

Data source. Live Supabase businesses table, filtered to vertical_id matching the fence-contractors vertical, is_active = true. Snapshot taken 2026-05-01 by scripts/research/build-sprint-1-snapshots-2026-05-01.ts. Full per-state + per-city aggregation at /research/data/fence-contractor-availability-2026.csv.

Aggregation rules. Same as the §90 sister studies (solar, dermatology, HVAC). "Listed" = active row with non-null city + state. "Rated" = rating > 0. "Total reviews" = sum of review_count across rows with review_count > 0. "Weighted average rating" = sum(rating × review_count) / sum(review_count). "Per 100k" uses Census 2024 vintage and is emitted only for the 25 states in src/lib/research/state-pop-2024.ts.

Exclusions. Inactive listings; rows missing city or state. No estimation of the unindexed tail.

Reproducibility. The dated CSV is the canonical snapshot. Re-running the script later will produce a different file as Supabase ingest continues.

External public-data context. National workforce figures cite BLS OEWS occupation 47-4031 (Fence Erectors), May 2024 release. NAICS 238990 (All Other Specialty Trade Contractors) is not cited because the code is a residual catch-all and substantially overstates fence-vertical supply. BEA Regional Economic Accounts data is not cited because fencing demand is housing-stock-driven (single-family starts, lot size, suburb/exurb mix), not income-driven. Aggregate national figures are not used to validate any individual indexed business.

No outcome claims. Reports listing presence and review accumulation only. No claims about contractor pricing, project quality, or licensure status. Buyers should request written quotes and look up state contractor-board licensure on the relevant state portal before signing.

Cite this study

OwnListed Research. (2026). Fence Contractor Availability and Review Density Report 2026 — Indexed Coverage Across the United States. OwnListed. https://ownlisted.com/research/fence-contractor-availability-2026
https://ownlisted.com/research/fence-contractor-availability-2026
@misc{ownlisted2026fencecontractoravailability2026, author = {OwnListed Research}, title = {Fence Contractor Availability and Review Density Report 2026 — Indexed Coverage Across the United States}, year = {2026}, url = {https://ownlisted.com/research/fence-contractor-availability-2026}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-04} }

Snapshot date: 2026

Dataset: Download CSV (2,376 records)

Press / data requests: press@ownlisted.com

Directory

Find a fence contractor near you

Browse our directory of listed fence contractors across thousands of cities. Compare ratings, read reviews, and connect directly.

Explore Fence Contractors

Related research

Research

State of Local Home Services 2026 | Ownlisted Annual Report

April 2026

Research

Local Service Directory Quality Benchmark 2026 — Coverage, Rating, Review Depth, Category Breadth

April 2026

Solar Panel Installers

U.S. Solar Installer Supply Index 2026 — Indexed Coverage, Review Density, and Per-Capita Distribution

May 2026

ownlisted

An independent research organization studying the local economy.


RESEARCH

  • Research hub
  • All studies
  • Data platform
  • Press kit

NETWORK

  • Coverage
  • Healthcare graph
  • Trades graph
  • Indexed coverage

ABOUT

  • Mission
  • Methodology
  • Editorial policy
  • Corrections log
  • Press kit
  • Contact

SUBSCRIBE

The monthly research digest. One email, first of each month. Unsubscribe anytime.


© 2026 OWNLISTED RESEARCH · DATA SNAPSHOT MAY 3, 2026 · BUILT WITH CARE

  • X
  • LINKEDIN
  • PRESS