cms-provider-data-catalog · CMS
cms-provider-data-catalog · CMS
cms-provider-data-catalog · CMS
cms-provider-data-catalog · CMS
cms-provider-data-catalog · CMS
CMS publishes a running record of the deals that move America's hospitals from one owner to another. The Hospital Change of Ownership file lists each transaction in which the entity holding a hospital's Medicare billing number changes hands — a buyer, a seller, an effective date, and a type code marking it as a plain change of ownership or an acquisition/merger. It is the closest thing to a public ledger of who is buying hospitals. Read it end to end and the surprising thing is what is not there: no acquirer of any size. The buying is spread across hundreds of organizations that each take one or two hospitals and stop.
Hospitals change hands — mostly as quiet reassignments
Of the 755 ownership changes on the file, 646 — 85.6% — are coded as a plain CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP; only 109 (14.4%) are coded as an ACQUISITION/MERGER. The headline kind of hospital ownership change is the administrative kind.
| Change type | Code | Transactions | Share of file |
|---|---|---|---|
| Change of ownership | CH | 646 | 85.6% |
| Acquisition / merger | AM | 109 | 14.4% |
Source: CMS Hospital Change of Ownership, by type code, snapshot 2026-06-17.
The distinction matters for how the file should be read. A plain change of ownership is the reassignment of a hospital's Medicare provider agreement to a new owner — often a corporate restructuring or a system folding a facility into its books. The acquisition/merger code, the smaller block, is the one closer to the deals that make headlines, and it skews more recent: 60.6% of AM filings took effect from 2020 onward, against 53.9% of CH filings. Either way, the file records the transaction, not its price, and not the reason behind it.
A change-of-ownership filing records a transaction, not a verdict. It marks the date Medicare's billing entity for a hospital changed hands — and says nothing about the price, the motive, or the quality of care before or after.
No national roll-up: the buyer side is fragmented
The ten most active buyers on the file account for just 87 of the 755 changes — 11.5% — and the single most active buyer took 12, or 1.6%. There is no acquirer consolidating hospitals at national scale here.
| Buyer | Acquisitions | Distinct sellers | States |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dignity Community Care | 12 | 1 | 2 |
| Medical University Hospital Authority | 10 | 5 | 1 |
| Prisma Health-Upstate | 10 | 2 | 1 |
| HMH Hospitals Corporation | 10 | 4 | 1 |
| Sutter Bay Hospitals | 10 | 4 | 1 |
| Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado | 8 | 4 | 2 |
| University of California Irvine | 7 | 5 | 1 |
| St Joseph Health Northern California LLC | 7 | 4 | 1 |
| OSF Healthcare System | 6 | 4 | 1 |
Source: CMS Hospital Change of Ownership, the most active buyers by transaction count, snapshot 2026-06-17.
The names are almost all regional: a state hospital authority, a university health system, a single-state non-profit. Each buyer operates in one or two states, not nationwide. The geography says the same thing — the busiest state, California, holds only 9.8% of the file, and no state reaches 10%. The buying is not being done by a few national firms acquiring across the map; it is being done by many local systems each consolidating their own backyard.
The engine is regional systems, not national chains
276 of the 461 buyers — 59.9% — appear exactly once, while 185 repeat buyers (two or more changes) drive 63.4% of all transactions at 2.59 each. Both facts are true at once, and together they describe the shape of the market: a long tail of one-time buyers, and a smaller core of repeat regional acquirers doing most of the volume — but none of them large.
That core is where what little concentration exists lives. The largest single cluster on the entire file makes the point. Dignity Community Care's 12 acquisitions are all from one seller — Dignity Health — all effective the same day in early 2019. That is not an outside firm buying up hospitals; it is one health system reassigning a dozen of its own facilities in a single corporate reorganization tied to the formation of CommonSpirit Health. The biggest "buyer" on the file is a system reorganizing itself.
This is the opposite of the pattern in nursing-home ownership concentration, where a comparatively small set of chains controls a large share of facilities. Hospitals, on this evidence, do not consolidate that way: ownership moves often, but it moves to many different hands.
When hospitals change hands
Hospital ownership change runs in waves rather than rising steadily — 2019 was the busiest year at 127 transactions, followed by 2024 at 101. The file does not show a one-directional acceleration of hospital dealmaking.
| First-effective year | Transactions | Acquisition/merger |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 60 | 12 |
| 2017 | 59 | 11 |
| 2018 | 95 | 13 |
| 2019 | 127 | 10 |
| 2020 | 73 | 10 |
| 2021 | 89 | 18 |
| 2022 | 38 | 5 |
| 2023 | 74 | 8 |
| 2024 | 101 | 13 |
| 2025 | 39 | 9 |
Source: CMS Hospital Change of Ownership, by the year each change first took effect, 2016–2025. 2025 is a partial, still-settling year as late filings arrive.
The peaks line up with periods of system consolidation — 2019's high is inflated by the Dignity reorganization above — and the troughs, such as 2022, with quieter years. The 2025 figure is low because the snapshot is recent and late filings for the most recent year are still arriving; it should not be read as a decline.
Where ownership changes most
California (74 transactions, 9.8%) and Texas (64, 8.5%) see the most hospital ownership change, but no state holds even a tenth of the file — the same fragmentation visible on the buyer side, now in geography.
| State | Transactions | Share of file |
|---|---|---|
| California | 74 | 9.8% |
| Texas | 64 | 8.5% |
| Illinois | 38 | 5.0% |
| Oklahoma | 34 | 4.5% |
| North Carolina | 32 | 4.2% |
| Florida | 31 | 4.1% |
| Louisiana | 31 | 4.1% |
| South Carolina | 31 | 4.1% |
| Georgia | 29 | 3.8% |
| Arkansas | 24 | 3.2% |
Source: CMS Hospital Change of Ownership, the ten states with the most transactions, snapshot 2026-06-17.
The list tracks state size and hospital count more than any regional consolidation story. And the changes are not just a big-city, big-system phenomenon: 167 of the 755 transactions (22.1%) involve rural critical-access hospitals, the small facilities that anchor care in low-population counties.
What one row actually is
Each row in cms_hospital_chow is one ownership-change transaction: the hospital's Medicare CCN and provider type, the buyer and seller organizations, the change type and its code, the effective date, and the state. Counting and grouping these rows is the entire method here. The published file is a single snapshot of the transactions on record — 755 of them, dated 2026-06-17 — not a complete census of every U.S. hospital deal ever done, and not a financial record: it carries no purchase price. NPI is present on the rows but the NPI-to-entity-graph link is deferred, so a change of ownership renders on no individual hospital profile. Every figure in this study is a count or percentage at the transaction, buyer, type, year, or state level. No individual person is named, and buyer and seller names appear only as the factual aggregate unit of a count.
Methodology
All figures are direct aggregations over the cms_hospital_chow table, populated from the CMS Hospital Change of Ownership public-use file published through the CMS data catalog (data.cms.gov, Medicare provider enrollment / PECOS). The table holds 755 transaction rows across 742 distinct Medicare CCNs, 461 distinct buyers, and 491 distinct sellers; snapshot 2026-06-17; public, read-only; license US-Government-Works. Effective dates span 2016-01-01 to 2025-12-28.
This study reads the published file as a whole — every row is one transaction CMS lists as having an ownership change on record — rather than filtering to a reference period. The unit of analysis is the transaction, not the hospital: a hospital (CCN) can appear in more than one row across the period, so distinct-CCN and transaction counts differ slightly. Type figures use the chow_type_code field (CH = change of ownership, AM = acquisition/merger). Buyer concentration is computed over the buyer_name field exactly as recorded, with no entity resolution across legal-name variants, so a system that files under more than one legal name is counted as more than one buyer — a conservative choice that, if anything, understates concentration. Year figures use chow_effective_date, the date the change first took effect. Because these are counts and ratios over a published file, every figure is exact as of the snapshot rather than estimated. Methodology version: cms-hospital-chow/v1. The source-provenance contract is documented in the provenance methodology.
Limitations
- A transaction record, not a quality, financial-distress, or conduct signal. A change of ownership is the reassignment of a hospital's Medicare billing entity. It is unrelated to discipline, sanction, exclusion, or any assessment of care. This study draws no inference about price, motive, or quality from the presence of a transaction.
- Aggregate level only. Every figure is a count or percentage at the transaction, buyer, type, year, or state level. No individual person is named; buyer and seller organizations appear only as the factual aggregate unit of a count, and the NPI-to-entity-graph link is deferred, so a change renders on no hospital profile.
- A single snapshot of 755 transactions, not a complete deal census. The file is one point-in-time snapshot dated 2026-06-17. It is not guaranteed to contain every hospital ownership change ever filed, and CMS refreshes it over time, so counts shift between releases. This study does not model change over time beyond counting the effective-date years present.
- The transaction, not the hospital, is the unit. A hospital can change hands more than once across 2016–2025, so transaction counts exceed distinct-hospital counts. Per-hospital ownership history is not reconstructed here.
- No entity resolution on buyer and seller names. Names are counted exactly as recorded. A system filing under several legal-name variants is counted as several distinct buyers, which understates true buyer concentration rather than overstating it.
- 2025 is partial. Because the snapshot is recent, the most recent effective year is still accumulating late filings and reads low; it is not evidence of a decline.
Sources
- CMS — Hospital Change of Ownership — the Medicare provider-enrollment change-of-ownership public-use data behind every figure in this study.
- CMS — Provider and supplier enrollment — the Medicare enrollment program (PECOS) under which a hospital files a change of ownership.
- CMS — Change of ownership (CHOW) guidance — how CMS defines and processes a hospital change of ownership and the carryover of the Medicare provider agreement.
The companion data catalog lists the source families behind Fonteum's research. This is the transaction mirror of the nursing-home ownership concentration study, and it sits alongside the hospital balance-sheet work — ownership type and operating margins, the hospitals running lowest on days of cash on hand, and financial distress and rural access — as well as hospital-acquired condition penalties and how concentrated ACO participation has become.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a hospital change of ownership (CHOW)?
- A CHOW is the formal filing a hospital makes with CMS when the entity that holds its Medicare billing number changes hands. It records a buyer, a seller, an effective date, and a type — either a plain change of ownership or an acquisition/merger. The hospital's Medicare certification (its CCN) carries over to the new owner. The filing marks who is now responsible for the Medicare provider agreement; it is an enrollment record, not a price or a deal valuation.
- Who buys the most hospitals in this data?
- No one buys many. The most active single buyer on the file accounts for 12 of the 755 changes (1.6%), and that cluster is one health system reorganizing its own hospitals. The ten most active buyers together hold only 87 changes, 11.5% of the file. The average buyer appears 1.64 times, and 59.9% of all 461 buyers appear exactly once.
- Is the hospital market being rolled up by a few big chains?
- Not on this file. The buyer side is highly fragmented: the top ten buyers hold 11.5% of all changes and most buyers appear once. What concentration exists runs through repeat regional buyers — 185 buyers with two or more changes account for 63.4% of transactions — but no single national acquirer dominates. This is the opposite pattern from nursing-home ownership, where a smaller set of chains controls a large share of facilities.
- What's the difference between a CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP and an ACQUISITION/MERGER here?
- They are the two type codes CMS records on the filing. A plain change of ownership (code CH) is the more administrative case — the Medicare provider agreement is reassigned to a new owner — and it covers 85.6% of the file. An acquisition/merger (code AM) is the smaller block at 14.4%, and it skews more recent, with 60.6% of AM filings effective since 2020. Both are recorded as transactions; neither carries a price.
- Does a change of ownership mean something went wrong at the hospital?
- No. A CHOW filing is an enrollment transaction, not a disciplinary, financial-distress, or quality signal. Ownership changes for many ordinary reasons — system consolidation, corporate restructuring, a parent reorganizing subsidiaries. This study draws no inference about price, motive, or the quality of care at any hospital before or after a change, and names no individual.
- How is this different from your nursing-home ownership study?
- The nursing-home study measures ownership concentration in a point-in-time snapshot of who owns facilities now. This study measures ownership-change transactions — events over time, each with a buyer, a seller, and a date. One asks how concentrated current ownership is; the other asks how often, and to whom, hospitals change hands. The hospital transaction file shows a fragmented buyer side, in contrast to the more concentrated nursing-home picture.
- Can I reproduce these figures?
- Yes. Every number is a direct count over the public cms_hospital_chow table — CMS's Hospital Change of Ownership file, snapshot dated 2026-06-17 — with no modeling. The exact SQL for the type mix, the buyer concentration, the repeat-buyer share, the year-by-year effective dates, and the state breakdown is published in the reproducibility block below.
Who uses this data
The source data behind this study is public
Compliance teams, journalists, and researchers work from the same federal source families cited above — queried by NPI or facility identifier through Fonteum’s open dataset pages and API. Every figure traces to a frozen, downloadable snapshot you can reproduce yourself.
Datasets used
Reproducibility
Every claim, reproducible
The SQL
-- Who is buying America's hospitals — and the answer is: almost everyone, a
-- little. Fully reproducible query.
--
-- Question: across the hospital Change-of-Ownership (CHOW) transactions CMS
-- publishes, what kind of ownership change is it, who is on the buying side,
-- when did it take effect, and where? The lead figure: the ten most active
-- buyers account for just 87 of 755 changes (11.5%), 59.9% of all buyers
-- appear exactly once, and the single largest cluster on the file is one
-- health system reorganizing itself. A CHOW filing records a transaction, NOT
-- a quality, fraud, or wrongdoing signal of any kind.
--
-- Source:
-- public.cms_hospital_chow — CMS "Hospital Change of Ownership" public-use
-- file, published via the CMS data catalog (data.cms.gov, Medicare
-- provider enrollment / PECOS). 755 transaction rows across 742 distinct
-- Medicare CCNs; snapshot 2026-06-17. Public, read-only. License:
-- US-Government-Works (17 U.S.C. Sec. 105).
-- methodology_version = 'cms-hospital-chow/v1'.
--
-- Universe: this study reads the published file AS A WHOLE — every row is one
-- hospital ownership-change transaction CMS lists, with a buyer identity, a
-- seller identity, a CHOW type, an effective date, and a state. The file is
-- a single point-in-time snapshot (snapshot 2026-06-17) of the transactions
-- on record; it is not a complete census of every U.S. hospital deal ever.
--
-- Counting note: the unit of analysis is the TRANSACTION (one row), not the
-- hospital. A hospital (CCN) can appear in more than one transaction across
-- the period. Buyer / seller names are the organizational entities recorded
-- on the filing; no individual person is named in the study, and names are
-- used only as the factual aggregate unit of a count.
-- ============================================================================
-- (1) Universe reconciliation — the published file at a glance.
-- ============================================================================
SELECT
count(*) AS events,
count(DISTINCT ccn) AS distinct_ccn,
count(DISTINCT buyer_name) AS distinct_buyers,
count(DISTINCT seller_name) AS distinct_sellers,
count(*) FILTER (WHERE buyer_name IS NULL OR buyer_name = '') AS null_buyer,
count(*) FILTER (WHERE seller_name IS NULL OR seller_name = '') AS null_seller,
count(*) FILTER (WHERE state IS NULL OR state = '') AS null_state,
min(chow_effective_date) AS earliest,
max(chow_effective_date) AS latest,
max(snapshot_date) AS snapshot
FROM public.cms_hospital_chow;
-- events 755 · distinct_ccn 742 · distinct_buyers 461 · distinct_sellers 491
-- null_buyer 0 · null_seller 0 · null_state 0
-- earliest 2016-01-01 · latest 2025-12-28 · snapshot 2026-06-17
-- ============================================================================
-- (2) WHAT KIND of change. 85.6% are plain CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP filings; only
-- 14.4% are coded ACQUISITION/MERGER. Most hospital ownership change is a
-- quiet reassignment of the Medicare billing entity, not a headline merger.
-- ============================================================================
SELECT
chow_type_code,
chow_type,
count(*) AS events,
round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1) AS pct_of_all
FROM public.cms_hospital_chow
GROUP BY chow_type_code, chow_type
ORDER BY events DESC;
-- CH CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP 646 85.6%
-- AM ACQUISITION/MERGER 109 14.4%
-- ============================================================================
-- (3) HEADLINE: buyer-side concentration. The ten most active buyers hold just
-- 87 of 755 changes (11.5%); the single most active buyer took 12 (1.6%).
-- There is no national roll-up here.
-- ============================================================================
SELECT
buyer_name,
count(*) AS acquisitions,
count(DISTINCT seller_name) AS distinct_sellers,
count(DISTINCT state) AS states
FROM public.cms_hospital_chow
GROUP BY buyer_name
ORDER BY acquisitions DESC
LIMIT 10;
-- DIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE 12 · 1 seller · 2 states
-- MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY 10 · 5 sellers · 1 state
-- PRISMA HEALTH-UPSTATE 10 · 2 sellers · 1 state
-- HMH HOSPITALS CORPORATION 10 · 4 sellers · 1 state
-- SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS 10 · 4 sellers · 1 state
-- CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO 8 · 4 sellers · 2 states
-- UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE 7 · 5 sellers · 1 state
-- BOWLING GREEN-WARREN COUNTY COMMUNITY .. 7 · 4 sellers · 1 state
-- ST JOSEPH HEALTH NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LLC 7 · 4 sellers · 1 state
-- OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM 6 · 4 sellers · 1 state
-- (top 10 buyers = 87 of 755 changes = 11.5% of the file.)
-- ============================================================================
-- (4) The concentration, computed directly. 59.9% of buyers appear exactly
-- once; the 185 repeat buyers (2+ changes) drive 63.4% of all changes at
-- 2.59 each on average. Consolidation runs through many regional systems,
-- not a handful of national chains.
-- ============================================================================
WITH b AS (
SELECT buyer_name, count(*) AS n
FROM public.cms_hospital_chow
GROUP BY buyer_name
)
SELECT
count(*) AS distinct_buyers,
count(*) FILTER (WHERE n = 1) AS one_time_buyers,
round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE n = 1) / count(*), 1) AS one_time_pct,
count(*) FILTER (WHERE n >= 2) AS repeat_buyers,
sum(n) FILTER (WHERE n >= 2) AS events_by_repeat,
round(100.0 * sum(n) FILTER (WHERE n >= 2) / sum(n), 1) AS repeat_event_pct,
round(avg(n), 2) AS avg_per_buyer,
round(avg(n) FILTER (WHERE n >= 2), 2) AS avg_per_repeat,
max(n) AS max_acquisitions
FROM b;
-- distinct_buyers 461 · one_time_buyers 276 (59.9%) · repeat_buyers 185
-- events_by_repeat 479 (63.4%) · avg_per_buyer 1.64 · avg_per_repeat 2.59
-- max_acquisitions 12
-- ============================================================================
-- (5) The largest single cluster is internal. DIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE's 12
-- acquisitions are all from DIGNITY HEALTH, all effective 2019-02-01, all
-- coded CH (change of ownership) — an intra-system reorganization (the
-- Dignity Health / CommonSpirit transition), not an outside acquisition.
-- ============================================================================
SELECT
buyer_name,
seller_name,
chow_type_code,
count(*) AS events,
min(chow_effective_date) AS first_effective,
max(chow_effective_date) AS last_effective
FROM public.cms_hospital_chow
WHERE buyer_name ILIKE '%DIGNITY%' OR seller_name ILIKE '%DIGNITY%'
GROUP BY buyer_name, seller_name, chow_type_code
ORDER BY events DESC
LIMIT 5;
-- DIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE <- DIGNITY HEALTH CH 12 2019-02-01 .. 2019-02-01
-- PORT CITY OPERATING COMPANY LLC <- DIGNITY HEALTH CH 2 2016-06-01
-- DIGNITY HEALTH <- DIGNITY HEALTH AM 1 2020-01-31
-- ============================================================================
-- (6) WHEN — first-effective year of each change, 2016 onward. Volume runs in
-- waves (2019 = 127, 2024 = 101) rather than rising steadily; 2025 is a
-- partial / still-settling year as late filings arrive.
-- ============================================================================
SELECT
extract(year FROM chow_effective_date)::int AS effective_year,
count(*) AS events,
count(*) FILTER (WHERE chow_type_code = 'AM') AS acquisition_merger
FROM public.cms_hospital_chow
GROUP BY effective_year
ORDER BY effective_year;
-- 2016 60 · 2017 59 · 2018 95 · 2019 127 · 2020 73
-- 2021 89 · 2022 38 · 2023 74 · 2024 101 · 2025 39 (partial)
-- ============================================================================
-- (7) WHERE — the states with the most hospital ownership change. California
-- (74) and Texas (64) lead; no state holds even 10% of the file, the same
-- fragmentation visible on the buyer side.
-- ============================================================================
SELECT
state,
count(*) AS events,
round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1) AS pct_of_all
FROM public.cms_hospital_chow
WHERE state IS NOT NULL AND state <> ''
GROUP BY state
ORDER BY events DESC
LIMIT 10;
-- CA 74 9.8% · TX 64 8.5% · IL 38 5.0% · OK 34 4.5% · NC 32 4.2%
-- FL 31 4.1% · LA 31 4.1% · SC 31 4.1% · GA 29 3.8% · AR 24 3.2%
-- ============================================================================
-- (8) Provider-type mix — every row is a hospital, but a fifth are rural
-- critical-access hospitals (167 of 755 = 22.1%), a reminder that ownership
-- change is not just a big-city, big-system phenomenon.
-- ============================================================================
SELECT
provider_type,
count(*) AS events,
round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1) AS pct_of_all
FROM public.cms_hospital_chow
GROUP BY provider_type
ORDER BY events DESC;
-- PART A PROVIDER - HOSPITAL 587 77.7%
-- PART A PROVIDER - CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL 167 22.1%
-- PART A PROVIDER - RURAL EMERGENCY HOSPITAL 1 0.1%The snapshot
| dataset_id | cms-provider-data-catalog |
| snapshot_date | 2026-06-17 |
| sha256 | |
| doi | 10.5072/fonteum/hospital-ownership-changes-2026 |
| slsa_provenance_url |
The JOINs
universe: the published file as a whole -- 755 transaction rows, snapshot 2026-06-17, 742 distinct CCNs type mix = GROUP BY chow_type_code -- CH 646 (85.6%), AM 109 (14.4%) buyer concentration: top 10 buyers by count -- 87 of 755 = 11.5%; max single buyer 12 (1.6%); avg 1.64 repeat buyers = buyers with >= 2 changes -- 185 buyers drive 479 of 755 (63.4%); 276 (59.9%) appear once largest cluster: Dignity Community Care <- Dignity Health -- 12 changes, all effective 2019-02-01, type CH (intra-system) first-effective year = extract(year from chow_effective_date) -- 2019 peak 127, 2024 101, 2025 39 (partial) state mix: GROUP BY state -- CA 74 (9.8%), TX 64 (8.5%); no state holds 10%
The pipeline version
| git_sha | |
| slsa_provenance | |
| methodology_version | cms-hospital-chow/v1 |
Reproduce this
Run the exact query against the frozen 2026-06-17.
Cite this study
Citation-ready for researchers and AI.
Check the chain
Each figure is snapshot-attested — re-derive the hash from the federal file.
cms-provider-data-catalog · 2026-06-17SHA-256 a3f1c9…7e6b- FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026Who owns America's nursing homes: a concentration story, 2026Of the 14,425 U.S. skilled nursing facilities in CMS's PECOS ownership file, only 28.1% are independent — owned by individuals or a single-facility entity. The other 71.9% disclose a multi-facility organization among their owners, and 52.3% belong to a group of 10 or more facilities.
- FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026For-profit, nonprofit, or government: who owns America's hospitals, and which model makes moneyAcross 6,019 US hospitals in the federal HCRIS cost reports, for-profit facilities are the only ownership class earning a positive average operating margin — +0.19% — while nonprofit hospitals average −4.75% and government hospitals −62.38%. The ranking holds on every measure, but the gap is narrower than the averages suggest.
- FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026Rural hospital closures, by the numbers: which hospitals are most at riskRural Critical Access Hospitals — the small facilities at the center of the closure crisis — run a 50.4% financial-distress rate, against 39.2% for urban hospitals, across 6,019 Medicare hospitals in the federal HCRIS cost reports. Their average operating margin is −8.93%, and 682 are losing money on patient care.
- FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026Hospitals running out of cash: the days-cash signal, and why most of it is a reporting artifactFederal HCRIS cost reports let us compute days cash on hand for 5,459 hospitals, but facility-level figures are distorted by system-level cash pooling — so the raw '2,800 hospitals under 30 days' headline is mostly noise. The defensible signal is narrower: 690 hospitals that report thin cash and also run an operating loss.
- CARE QUALITY · JUN 2026The 1% penalty: which hospitals lose Medicare pay for hospital-acquired conditions, FY2026In CMS's FY2026 Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, 719 of 3,055 hospitals — the worst-performing quarter by total HAC score — lose 1% of every Medicare payment for the year. The cut is graded on a curve: most hospitals beat the national infection baseline, yet a fixed quartile is penalized regardless.
Federal source citations
Fonteum Research · June 17, 2026 · All figures trace to the frozen federal-data snapshot cited above.